The stepless focus and Iris is awesome but again i'm going to eventually purchase a Rokinon set with all of these features and better visual quality.Įdit- I should however add the price factor. So in summary, I personally value the faster and constant aperture over the parfocal and longer 12-60mm. ![]() The other two lenses will be reserved for non cinematic projects. ![]() After that I plan to upgrade to a Rokinon set and use true cinema, video style lenses. Definitely a positive in every way though.Īnd lastly these two lenses are just to get me started and familiar with my PCC 4K. This is why to me parfocal isn't too important. And if it does you probably would want a follow focus gear wrapped around the zoom ring so that you don't shake the camera as you zoom with your hand. Moreso than there is from 3.5-4 (to my eyes, on that camera).Īlso unless you are filming live events zooming during the shot is (in my experience) probably not going to happen too often. Also the 12-60 is only F3.5 max, I recently did a series of camera test with a friends camera at my church and there is a large difference between f2.8 and 3.5. This is based off of my uses but you may benefit some from my thoughts on thisįor me one of the uses is to film an indoor church service in low light conditions, so the constant aperture of 2.8 is helpful. ![]() ![]() My two cents, I am purchasing both the lumix 12-35 and 35-100.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |